Legal Opinion

Korgan v. Walsleben

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 4, 1994No. 9203-01733; CA A78474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to ORCP 67B in favor of defendant Bassett (defendant), after the court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

Plaintiffs were the vendees of a land sale contract for a house in which they lived. The Walslebens, who are not parties to this appeal, were the vendors. With the assistance of their attorney, defendant Bassett, the Walslebens obtained a strict foreclosure of the land sale contract. On the day that the final judgment of foreclosure was signed by the trial court judge, defendant also obtained a writ of assistance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Shaughnessy v. SprayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Isler v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. Turlay v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Korgan v. WalslebenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Walsleben v. KorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API