Legal Opinion

Gatzemeyer v. Neligh Township

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1989No. 87-881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mullen, D.J.

The plaintiff, Alan Gatzemeyer, appeals from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Neligh Township and Robert Muller. As a matter of law, the trial court found Gatzemeyer was negligent and the defendants were not negligent. Gatzemeyer claims the court erred in finding (1) he was negligent as a matter of law; (2) his negligence was a bar to recovery as a matter of law; and (3) the defendants were not negligent as a matter of law. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

For the purposes of the summary judgment hearing, the trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prime Inc. v. Younglove Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Converse v. MORSE BY MORSENebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Allan v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Chmelka v. Continental Western InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Sherbeck v. SchaperNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Burwell v. KelleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Stinson v. City of LincolnNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. First Security Savings v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bank of Burwell v. KelleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Stinson v. City of LincolnNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API