Hart v. Metropolitan Discount Co.

1. Testimony of one whose name appears as the maker of a negotiable instrument, that he signed and delivered it without filling *808various blanks therein, and with the understanding that the blanks would not be filled until he should consent to the completion of the instrument and its use, and that thereafter, without his knowledge or consent, the blanks were filled in, would not support a plea of non est factum, or constitute a valid defense against á bona fide transferee for value and before maturity.

Decided March 2, 1920. Complaint; from Marion superior court—Judge Howard. October 27, 1919.…