Ewing v. Warner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant John M. Warner (impleaded with Eosa Warner, his wife, and the city of St. Paul) from a judgment of partition in an action brought in the district court for Eamsey county and tried by Kerr, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
George W. Ewing, Jr., or 2d, being the owner of an ■undivided fifteenth of a large number of tracts of land, including the lots in controversy, on December 31, 1863, conveyed the same in trust to his father, George W. Ewing, 1st. This trust-deed is plaintiff’s Exhibit G. Th&term “legal representatives,” in the fourth subdivision of the declaration of the trust, is evidently used as synonymous with “heirs,” or those to whom the property would have descended had the grantor died seised of it. The defendant, indeed, conceded on the argument that the deed created a valid trust. March 1, 1866, the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ewing v. ShannahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Newton v. RebenackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- Anderson v. KemperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. SninderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Alford v. Consolidated Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.