United States National Bank v. Venner
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract on a judgment, alleged to have been recovered by the plaintiff against the defendant in the Supreme Court of’ New York. Trial in the Superior Court, without a jury, before Hammond, J., who found for the plaintiff; and the defendant' alleged exceptions, which appear in the opinion. •
1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.
The writ in this case describes the plaintiff as the United States National Bank of New York, N. Y., a banking association or corporation duly established by law, being duly organized and incorporated under the laws of the United States of America, and having its usual place of business in the city and State of New York.
The declaration is as follows: “ And the plaintiff says that by the consideration of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held at New York for the city and county of New York, in said State of New York, on the 7th day of January, 1897, it duly recovered judgment against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thatcher v. West River National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Denham v. BryantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Washington County National Bank v. LeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trombley v. Stevens-Duryea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Portland Maine Publishing Co. v. Eastern Tractors Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Cronan v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Amato v. AmatoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Boston Building & Construction Corp. v. MulhernMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.