Legal Opinion

Cocoa Trading Corporation v. Bayway Terminal Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary question presented upon the appeal from the order denying the plaintiff’s motion to strike out as “ sham ” the first affirmative defense contained in the answer was whether it conclusively appeared that the allegations of the defendant that the plaintiff had “ duly assigned and transferred ” its cause of action and is no longer the “ real party in interest ” are false and cannot possibly be sustained by any proof which may be produced. We considered and determined no other question. Until the facts are more fully disclosed the question cannot be determined whether the plaintiff is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cocoa Trading Corporation v. Bayway Terminal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sosnow, Kranz & Simcoe, Inc. v. Storatti Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  2. Yale Transport Corp. v. Yellow Truck & Coach Mfg. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  3. Franklin v. Hussman Refrigeration Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. American News Co. v. Helm's New York-Pittsburgh Motor Express, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bagley & Sewall Co. v. Shell Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API