Legal Opinion
People v. Munger
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1969PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeating, J.
Appellants have been convicted of the crimes of felonious possession of narcotics and of bribery. They attack the sufficiency of the evidence establishing their guilt and also contend their guilt was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt. These claims are without merit. Also, we find no error in the court’s charge or in its rulings warranting a reversal. It is' necessary to discuss only three points — the denial of appellants’ motion to sever for purposes of trial the narcotics and the bribery charges, the legality of the search warrant, and the denial of an evidentiary hearing on the possible…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. ElwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- United States Ex Rel. Conroy v. BombardDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.