Whitehead & Hoag Co. v. Bastian Bros.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York
In Equity. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The bill alleges the infringement of three letters patent, the Studebaker patent, No. 615,921, dated December 13, 1898, the Hornich patent, No. 653,296, July 10, 1900, and Hornich patent, No. ISO,218, of May 9, 1905, now owned by complainant. The patents relate to improvements in bill hooks. The obje,ct of the patentee, Studebaker, was to construct an adjustable bill hook attached to a placard, and to construct it in compact form so as to facilitate distribution and to afford an economical, attractive, and useful advertising medium. The single claim of the patent reads…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Jones v. CyphersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whitehead & Hoag Co. v. KortzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914