Legal Opinion

State v. Underwood

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1975No. 46659Published

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

Surety, Summit Insurance Company, and its agent and attorney-in-fact, Medford Underwood, a bondsman, appeal trial court’s denial of their motion to set aside an order of forfeiture of an appeal bond in a criminal case.

Brigman, principal on the bond, was charged in the District Court of Bryan County with the crime of Operating a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor, Second and Subsequent Offense. Pending trial he was released on $1000 bond which was obtained thru Medford Underwood, acting as agent and attorney-in-fact for the Imperial Insurance Company.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacHell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Short v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API