Legal Opinion

American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. New York Rys. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 3, 1923No. 295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Facts of the kind that gave rise to this litigation have occurred before and have been presented to the courts of this circuit by a previous insolvency of the New York surface railway system. The receivership of the Metropolitan System, conducted under the title of Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Railway, presented the same problem of an operating company in insolvency which had carried on a unitary system of transportation by means largely of leased street railway lines. There, as here, the question arose as to what were the rights and/or property…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Trust Co. of New York v. Chicago & E. I. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
  4. Louisville Trust Co. v. Cincinnati Inclined-Plane Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  5. Morton Trust Co. v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. East TN Natural Gas v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API