Legal Opinion

Wright v. Denny

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 25, 2011No. 2834Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAIER, J.,

Plaintiff-appellant, Joe and Sharon Wright, h/w (“plaintiff’), brought this *489action against defendants Sirod Denny and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”), to recover damages stemming from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on June 30,2007. Anonjury trial commenced on September 16, 2010. The sole issue heard before this court was whether SEPTA was obligated to pay uninsured motorist benefits to plaintiff. On October 4, 2010, this court found that SEPTA was not obligated to pay those benefits. On October 8, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for post-trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Love v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. White v. School District of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Gielarowski v. Port AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Berman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Lowery v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API