Legal Opinion

State v. DeGidio

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1967No. 39683PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for uttering a forged prescription and using a false name in order to obtain narcotic drugs in violation of Minn. St. 618.18.

No evidence was submitted by the defendant. He discharged his first attorney, which prompted the court to declare a mistrial. The public defender was thereupon appointed and defendant waived a jury trial. He was then tried and found guilty by the court. The testimony of plaintiff’s witnesses permitted the court to find that on October 23, 1963, the defendant presented to one Stephen Kachina, a pharmacist at 4201 Webber…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Flores v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Johnson v. BurmeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MatousekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. DeGidio v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API