Legal Opinion
Carman v. European American Bank & Trust Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 24, 1991PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and order of the Appellate *1067Division brought up for review should be modified, with costs to defendant, by reversing so much thereof as affirmed the order of the Supreme Court which granted plaintiff an unqualified discharge of a docketed judgment and by substituting therefor a qualified discharge, and the judgment and order should otherwise be affirmed.
Plaintiff, whose personal liability for preexisting debts was discharged in a Federal bankruptcy proceeding, commenced this action under Debtor and Creditor Law § 150 for an order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Long v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by14 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas v. VitellasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Bank of New York v. MaoriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Christakis v. Jeanne D'Arc Credit UnionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- McArdle v. McGregorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Acquisitions Plus v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.