Legal Opinion

United States v. Fruit Products Corp.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 4, 1924No. 2415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Cherries in brine, pitted and sulphured, were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as cherries “prepared or preserved in any manner” and assessed for duty at 40 per cent ad valorem under that part of paragraph 737 of the act of 1922 which in part reads as follows:

Par. 737. * * . * Cherries prepared or preserved in any manner, 40 per cent ad valorem.

*338The importer protested that the importation was cherries sulphured or in brine and that the merchandise was therefore dutiable at 2 cents per pound under that part of paragraph 737, which reads asrfollows:

Cherries, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Causse Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Protest 922378-G of Irving W. Rice Co.United States Customs Court · 1938
  2. Christo Poulos & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Shallus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. United States v. Enbun Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. United States v. FranchiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API