Krajewski v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We accepted Krajewski v. State, 597 So.2d 814 (Fla. 4th DCA1992), for review because of its holding that the objective entrapment defense as explained in Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905, 105 S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985), is still viable. This holding conflicts with State v. Munoz, 586 So.2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA1991), review granted, 598 So.2d 77 (Fla.1992), which held that section 777.201, Florida Statutes (1987), abolished the objective entrapment test. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
The resolution of the conflict will be of no benefit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cruz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. MunozDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Krajewski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kinsey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993