Hough v. Leonard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
867 P.2d 438 (1993)
David HOUGH d/b/a Hough Oilfield Service, Appellee,
v.
Daniel LEONARD, Harold E. Burke, and David McMillan, Appellants.
No. 75755.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
September 21, 1993.
As Corrected September 29, 1993.
John R. Couch, Jr., Stillwater, for appellants.
Jessie V. Pilgrim and Joy C. Lorance, Tulsa, for appellee.
KAUGER, Justice:
The only issue addressed[1] is whether the trial court properly exercised jurisdiction over the three Texas residents who entered into a contract in Oklahoma with an Oklahoma resident to perform services in Kansas. We find that it did. However, we also…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Simms; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Hodges; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Simms; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Opala.
2Cases cited67 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.