Legal Opinion

COORSTEK KOREA LTD. v. LOOMIS PRODUCTS COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 2022No. 2:21-cv-05168Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COORSTEK KOREA LTD. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 21-5168 : LOOMIS PRODUCTS COMPANY : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. February 17, 2022 CoorsTek Korea Ltd. bought an isostatic press from Loomis Products Company to use in its manufacture of ceramic component parts. CoorsTek now claims the purchased product is not operating as expected and it seeks damages for breach of contract and breach of the implied warranty of merchantability under the parties’ contract and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. VLM Food Trading International, Inc. v. Illinois Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Judith Goldman v. Citigroup Global Markets IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. James W. Wood v. Prudential Insurance Company of America James W. Wood Karen Wood, Individually and as Guardians of Matthew Wood, Incompetent v. Prudential Insurance Company of America James Wood Karen Wood, Individually and as Guardians of Matthew Wood, IncompetentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API