Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 17, 1994No. 93-2239PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant, Janet Thompson, appeals her convictions for the sale of cocaine and for two counts of possession of cocaine and the resulting sentences. We affirm.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal on the sale count because there was insufficient evidence presented at trial necessary to exclude all reasonable hypotheses of innocence. We find sufficient evidence on the record to contradict the defendant’s theory of innocence and to support the denial of her motion of acquittal. See Taylor v. State, 583 So.2d 323 (Fla.1991); Perez v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ogden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API