Legal Opinion

Cody v. . England

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PlaiNtiiws’ Appeal.

"WiNboene, J.

Decision here turns upon the answers to these two questions: First. Where the county surveyor, instead of actually surveying the lines and boundaries of an entry, adopts a known natural object as the beginning corner, and merely plats on paper the lines and boundaries, designating in part courses and distances to stakes, are the stake corners to be located by measuring the distance by surface measure or by horizontal measure ? The answer is “by horizontal measure.”

The statute in effect at the date of entry No. 2335, 5 September, 1853, in question here, provides…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neal v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Bost v. Cabarrus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Clifton v. . WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  4. Redmond v. . MullenaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. William S. McEwen and Henry H. Wiley, in Error v. John Den, Lessee of Charles Bulkley and Stuart BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1861

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perry v. DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Tyser v. SearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API