Legal Opinion

State v. Spicuzza

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1991No. Nos. 55085, 58002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal. Defendant, Anthony L. Spicuzza, first appeals his conviction on Count VI, charging him with forgery. Defendant claims that the trial court clearly erred in allowing Lisa Chiodi-ni to testify about statements made to her by another employee, John Kaemerrer. According to Chiodini’s testimony, Kaem-errer told her that Spicuzza cashed a check from the Anthony Shirt Company payable to Letha Barnett in the amount of $489.00. Although defendant failed to specifically object to the testimony as hearsay at the time of trial, defendant claims…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. SupinskiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Cammann v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Goodson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Phelps v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Spicuzza v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API