State v. Spicuzza
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal. Defendant, Anthony L. Spicuzza, first appeals his conviction on Count VI, charging him with forgery. Defendant claims that the trial court clearly erred in allowing Lisa Chiodi-ni to testify about statements made to her by another employee, John Kaemerrer. According to Chiodini’s testimony, Kaem-errer told her that Spicuzza cashed a check from the Anthony Shirt Company payable to Letha Barnett in the amount of $489.00. Although defendant failed to specifically object to the testimony as hearsay at the time of trial, defendant claims…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. SupinskiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Cammann v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Goodson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Phelps v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Spicuzza v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.