Legal Opinion

United States v. Best

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 10, 2003No. 2:00-cr-00171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOZANO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on: (1) Defendant’s pro se Motion for a New Trial, filed August 26, 2002; (2) Defendant’s pro se Motion for a New Trial (Rule 33) and Appointment of New Counsel, filed September 16, 2002; and (3) Defendant’s Motion to Suppress [Evidence Related to Count 8] and Memorandum, filed September 16, 2002. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s August 26, 2002, and September 16, 2002, motions for a new trial are TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT Defendant’s Motion to Suppress [Evidence Related to Count 8] and Memorandum is DENIED. The parties are…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MedinaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  2. United States v. LlufrioDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API