Legal Opinion

In re Davis

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 21, 1929No. 2733PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESTES, District Judge.

The application by the bankrupt herein for a discharge is contested by a number of his creditors. The specifications allege, among other things, that he concealed assets and removed them, where they were discovered only after a careful and tedious search; that he conveyed property for the purpose of injuring and defrauding creditors; and that he made false oaths in connection with his schedules. His transactions are conceded to be sufficient to preclude his right to a discharge, unless the contesting creditors are estopped from interposing an objection to his discharge…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huntley v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1937
  2. Huntley v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API