Legal Opinion

Sgambelluri v. Recinos

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Daniel Palmieri, J.

This is a motion by defendant seeking to compel disclosure of various items. Specifically, a videotape of plaintiff’s wedding reception, photographs of the wedding reception, an authorization for Dr. Mary Lambarara and the name, address and phone number of the business that was hired to take the wedding video. Plaintiff opposes the motion and has cross-moved for a protective order.

*778Defendant’s motion is granted to the extent set forth herein and plaintiffs cross motion is denied.

This action arises out of an auto accident which occurred on September 23,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. v. RoemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Salzer v. Farm Family Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Romano v. Steelcase Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bermejo v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API