Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.D.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 14, 2002No. 01-1573PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This case concerns two siblings who were adjudicated children in need of assistance (CINA) under Iowa Code section 232.2(6)(d) (2001). The court of appeals affirmed the adjudication as to one child but not the other. We granted the State’s application for further review. Because the record supports CINA status for both children, we vacate the decision of the court of appeals and affirm the judgment of the juvenile court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Roger and Sharon are the adoptive parents of Vicki and Dustin. The children were adopted out of the foster care system when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Interest of C.B.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. In the Interest of J.R.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Raim v. StancelCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1983
  4. State v. FarnumSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. In the Interest of D.T.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. In the Interest of J.c, Minor Child. D.C., FatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. State v. HussSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  4. In the Interest of L.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Amended: March 10, 2015 in the Interest of J.C., Minor Child. D.C., FatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API