Legal Opinion

Cotten v. Frederick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2024No. 2023-1503Published

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 175 Ohio St.3d 475.] COTTEN, APPELLANT, v. FREDERICK, WARDEN, APPELLEE.1 [Cite as Cotten v. Frederick,

2024-Ohio-3250.] Habeas corpus—Appellant was incarcerated under a valid sentence of life imprisonment—Court of appeals’ dismissal of complaint affirmed. (No. 2023-1503—Submitted July 9, 2024—Decided August 29, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-23-44. __________________ The per curiam opinion below was joined by KENNEDY, C.J., and FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, BRUNNER, and DETERS, JJ. Per Curiam.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. CottonOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Stever v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API