Legal Opinion

Caswell v. Stearns

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1932No. Docket No. 35, January Term, 1932, Calendar No. 36,095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Retaxation oe Costs.

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from taxation of costs. The judgment in the circuit court was sum mary upon a claim against the estate of a deceased person. Upon appeal the judgment was reversed. Caswell v. Stearns, 257 Mich. 461.

The estate appealed, and its representatives gave a bond for $75,000, and, under Court Rule No. 5, have taxed $750, the cost of procuring the bond.

Rule "No. 5, § 7, provides:

'“Whenever a bond is required by law in any action or proceeding, the reasonable cost of procuring such bond.shall be part of the taxable costs of the case, unless otherwise ordered by the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caswell v. StearnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gaffier v. St. Johns HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Holding Corp. v. Mortgage Cont. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Liquidating Holding Corp. v. Mortgage & Contract Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API