Legal Opinion

Memorial Hospital v. Rockingham County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

We deem it inadvisable to make final disposition of the question sought to be presented, because the record is barren of any factual determination. It was agreed that this should be done by the court, but in drawing the judgment, which was evidently prepared by counsel, the factual basis of the judgment was omitted. A finding of the facts is desirable in order that we may determine the question of law or legal inference which the parties wish decided. Refining Co. v. McKernan, 178 N. C., 82, 100 S. E., 121; Trust Co. v. Transit Lines, 198 N. C., 675, 153 S. E., 158; S. c., 200 N. C., 415, 157…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raleigh Banking & Trust Co. v. Safety Transit Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Raleigh Banking & Trust Co. v. Safety Transit LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. McKernanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Warrenton v. Warren CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API