Legal Opinion

E. B. Elliott Co. v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 14, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, C. J.

This is our second consideration of this case. See Elliott v. E. B. Elliott Co., et al., 127 Fla. 158, 172 So. 686. The trans'cript in the latter appeal is made part of the record in the instant appeal which is from a decree enlarging the time for taking testimony and denying a motion for final decree on the pleadings.

Was the Chancellor guilty of an abuse of discretion in so decreeing? This is the sole question with which we are concerned here.

Equity Rule 71 which was incorporated in Section 46 of the 1931 Chancery Act provides that three months and no more, shall be allowed for the taking of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Demos v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Hancock v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Lykes v. BeauchampSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Magbee v. KennedySupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  5. Elliott v. E. B. Elliott Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Muller v. MaxcySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Glassman v. Deauville Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Tropicaire Engineering Service Corp. v. Chrysler Airtemp Sales Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  4. Hewett v. HewettSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Giddens v. GiddensSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API