Sammy Joe Downey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312, and now questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support a verdict of guilty and complains of two rulings of the trial court respecting the admission of evidence. We find no merit to any of such contentions.
The government made independent proof that the pertinent motor vehicle was stolen at Arnett, Oklahoma, and recovered at Higgins, Texas. The appellant admitted to a special agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation the taking of the car at Arnett and its transportation to and abandonment at Higging_ ^…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Christian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. PicarelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Mehan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by9 opinions
- John Phillips McClard Carroll Franklin Simmons, and Verlon Hershel Ussery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- James Carlock Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Frank Chase v. Richard Crisp, Warden of the Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Robert Owen McDonnell A/K/A Joe Mack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.