State v. Whitlock

Green, J.:

Pete Whitlock appeals from his prison sentence after being convicted of indecent liberties with a child in violation of K.S.A. 21-3503 and indecent solicitation of a child in violation of *557K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 21-3510(a)(l). Whitlock’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in not granting his request to be sentenced to an optional nonprison sentence. Nevertheless, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider Whitlock’s appeal under K.S.A. 2005 Supp. 21-4704(f). Moreover, because Whitlock’s sentence was within the presumptive sentence for the crime, this court lacks…