Legal Opinion
State v. Woodington
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
Although the appellant has enumerated 16 assignments of error, they will be categorized into four issues:
1. Were the activities of the state’s agents prior to trial such that there was a deprivation of due process requiring dismissal of the charges ?
2. Was the evidence sufficient to convict appellant beyond a reasonable doubt?
3. Were the instructions prejudicially erroneous?
4. Is sec. 189.19 (2) (d), Stats., void for vagueness?
*164The appellant contends that the conduct of the state’s officers, particularly the attorney general, during their investigation of MAGIC, and eventually Allied, deprived…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985