Legal Opinion

United States v. Ricardo Rubio-Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 25, 2016No. 14-50555Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

1. Sufficient evidence supports Ricardo Rubio-Garcia’s conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. Viewed in the light most favorable to the government, see United States v. Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1164 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc), the evidence showed that Rubio gave directions to a Mexican drug supplier that were to be relayed to a drug courier. Rubio then met the courier at a prearranged location, briefly spoke with him, and got in the passenger seat of the courier’s vehicle. Rubio directed the courier— whose vehicle was transporting ten kilograms of cocaine…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Parle v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Jose Rafael PenagosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API