Legal Opinion

Hanus v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1926No. 9633Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— Appellant insists that we reconsider the complaint of the refusal to submit to the jury the question whether the confession made by the appellant was voluntary.

From the testimony of Karutko, it appears that he was the owner of the barn that was burned; that on the day it was burned the appellant was brought to the witness by officers and in the presence of the officers a conservation took place. From the testimony of Karutko we quote:

“I do not remember the exact words I said to him in regard to the burning of the barn, but anyway, I told him I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ammons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. People v. SilversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API