Legal Opinion

Roberti v. Anderson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1904No. 1650PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Humboldt County; 8. J. Bonnifield, Jr., Judge. Action by Peter Roberti against J. P. Anderson. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Humboldt County; 8. J. Bonnifield, Jr., Judge. Action by Peter Roberti against J. P. Anderson. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. I. The evidence herein cited shows that the plaintiff was in no manner deceived by the defendant with reference to the disposition of said horse and that the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk incident to the breaking of the .young horse to a mower. Not only this, but his offer made to Ben Anderson and his…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Talbot, J.:

In the complaint it is alleged in substance: That the plaintiff was employed by the defendant to run a mower. On July 3, 1901, the defendant requested the plaintiff to work to the machine a horse which was unknown to him, which he had never seen before, and with the habits and disposition of which he was unacquainted. "That said defendant then and there informed this plaintiff that said horse was a broken and gentle animal. That said defendant then knew that said horse was neither broken nor gentle, but that he was a wild, dangerous, and uncontrollable animal, commonly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BuralliNevada Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Golden v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Perelli v. CandianiOregon Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ewing v. SargentNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Curti v. FranceschiNevada Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API