Legal Opinion

United States v. Weinberg

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 20, 1987No. 86 CR 226 (S-1)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Defendant is named in a sixteen-count superseding indictment. Count One charges that defendant violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), by conducting the affairs of an enterprise — his real estate business — through a pattern of racketeering. Seven predicate acts of racketeering are alleged.

The first four predicate acts arise from defendant’s ownership of a building at 123-25 82nd Avenue, Kew Gardens, Queens, New York. The First Act of Racketeering charges defendant with employing various…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. EisenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. EisenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. AndrewsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. United States v. Samuel WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Moeller v. ZaccariaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API