Legal Opinion

Nifong v. Texas Empire Pipe Line Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is a suit to recover the sum of $1,000 for loss of time and expenses, including attorney’s fees,- in defending a condemnation suit instituted by this defendant against plaintiffs, landowners, and those interested in four other tracts of land, which proceeding was thereafter dismissed by defendant before the appointment of commissioners to assess damages. The court overruled plaintiffs’ motion to strike out certain parts of defendant’s answer and, plaintiff refusing to plead further, on motion of defendant, judgment was rendered in favor of it on the pleadings. '

The pleadings disclosed…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. City of St. Louis v. MeintzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. Leisse v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Leisse v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Meadow Park Land Co. v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. 66, Inc. v. Crestwood Commons Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. 66, Inc. v. Crestwood Commons Redevelopment Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Center School District No. 58 of Jackson County v. KentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. BrandstetterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. North Kansas City School District of Clay County v. J. A. Peterson-Renner, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API