State v. Maggert
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farr
Defendants were convicted of assault in the second degree, upon an information filed in the district court of Pondera county, charging them with the crime of assault in the first degree, and they appeal from the judgment.
*334The first specification of error alleged is directed to the sufficiency of the information, which charges that the defendants on or about the twenty-third day of November, 1919, “did then and there commit the crime of assault in the first degree, to-wit, did then and there willfully * * * assault one C. C. Heth, * * * with a deadly weapon, to wit, an instrument about a foot…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. PeralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. WeirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- State v. OstmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MuguerzaIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. FredericksMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. MuguerzIdaho Supreme Court · 1928