Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Tulsa

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1976No. M-75-665Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

BUSSEY, Judge:

Appellee, The City of Tulsa, has filed a Petition for Rehearing in the above styled and numbered cause. In its Petition for Rehearing, Appellee argues:

“As reflected by the Official Transcript, Page 3, the Prosecution and the Defense stipulated as to the wording of the ordinance in open court, hence the Prosecution met its burden in making out a case at trial as required by Johnson v. City of Tulsa. (Okl.Crim. 258 P. 22, 695, at P. 701 [sic] 1.
“While this stipulation admittedly is not sufficient for appellate purposes, it is the contention of the appellee that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API