Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nacogdoches Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Lewis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1975No. 12327Published

1DissentPhillips, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent.

In Lewis v. Heritage Savings Association, 502 S.W.2d 943 (Tex.Civ.App.1973, no writ), this Court held that the failure of the Commissioner to follow Section 1.9 of the Rules and Regulations was not reversible error where no prejudice could be shown. I would follow the reasoning of that decision.

A reversal of the Heritage holding is not compelled by the holding of the Supreme Court in Bay City Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Lewis, 474 S.W.2d 459 (Tex.1971). A majority of this Court did not believe Bay City was controlling when Heritage was decided, and I do not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Koehn v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Bay City Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Muskego-Norway Consolidated Schools Joint School District No. 9 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Lewis v. Heritage Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API