Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Vinyard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Action of slander and title in which the defendant alleges that he is the owner and possessor and denies that the plaintiffs have title and possession.

Lucy, Adeline and Katie Hoover nee Hano, Virginie Raiford nee Hano, Thomas, Alfred, James, Foster, Clifford, Marcus, J. M., Frank, B. and Howard Hano, children and heirs of John and Mary Hano, claim to have actual physical possession as owners in indivisión of the SE1^ of the SW% of Section 14, T. 7 S., R. 8. E., containing forty acres more or less, by inheritance from their father and mother.

That E-. W. Vinyard has cut timber from said land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Ellis v. PrevostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  3. Atchafalaya Land Co. v. Brownell-Drews Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Slattery v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  5. Guillaume v. GuillaumeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API