Legal Opinion

Ex parte Beers

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 15, 1852PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tee Surrogate.

The decedent acknowledged the subscription of his name, at the end of the will, to the two subscribing witnesses. The document, at the time, lay open on a desk, covered with a piece of blank paper, so that no part was visible but the attestation clause, the signature, and the last line or two of the will. The witnesses might have read the attestation, but they did not, and were not requested to do so. One of them states that he read the greater part if not all of the first line of the attestation; but that line does not state the nature of the instrument. Neither of them, in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of DelpratNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  2. In re the Probate of the Will PulvermacherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API