Matter of Pardee v. . Rayfield
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 7, 1920, which unanimously affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a writ of prohibition. By chapter 328 of the Laws of 1917 the school system of the state was changed from the district system to the town unit system. By chapter 199 of the Laws of 1918 the act of 1917 was repealed and the old system of school districts restored.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 7, 1920, which unanimously affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a writ of prohibition. By chapter 328 of the Laws of 1917 the school system of the state was changed from the district system to the town unit system. By chapter 199 of the Laws of 1918 the act of 1917 was repealed and the old system of school districts restored. By chapter 561 of the Laws of 1919 provision was made for adjustment of accounts between school districts for expense…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Clark v. GilchristNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Town of Amherst v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Lewis v. Bd. of Education of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. MilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Vandeweghe v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.