Legal Opinion

Claim of Lachover v. C&A Builders, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 20, 1992, which held that the State Insurance Fund is estopped from denying coverage of a workers’ compensation policy.

The State Insurance Fund (hereinafter State Fund) issued a workers’ compensation policy to the employer that was effective from August 4, 1987 to August 4, 1988. The estimated annual premium for the policy was $1,781.66 based upon an annual payroll of $18,000. On June 20, 1988, as required, the State Fund audited the employer’s payroll to ascertain what its actual payroll was for the period between August…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Skolnick v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Gulf Trading, Inc. v. New Hampshire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Winn v. Hudson Valley Equine CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Claim of Tavano v. Tavano Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Claim of DiLascio v. Tilden Glen Head, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Trojcak v. Valiant Millwrighting & Warehousing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Claim of Johnson v. Via Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API