Legal Opinion

In re Condemnation of Lands Situated & Being in Scraton

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1993No. 1309 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The Redevelopment Authority of the City of Scranton (Condemnor) appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County setting aside a jury award of $160,000 and awarding John F. Sweeney and Helen Sweeney (Condemnees) a new trial. The issue raised for review is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial when it held that the verdict was inadequate and that the testimony of Condemnor’s expert was confusing to the jury. For the following reasons the trial court’s order is reversed.

On April 14, 1989, Condemnor filed a declaration of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Austin v. RidgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Mazur v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Tinicum Real Estate Holding Corp. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. HeroldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. FoxCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lehigh-Northampton Airport Authority v. FullerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Gross v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Tedesco v. Municipal Authority of Hazle TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Vestmont Limited Partnership v. DOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API