Legal Opinion

Michael Rosendale & Tamara D. Rosendale v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 2, 2018No. 7710-17LUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2018-99

UNITED STATES TAX COURT MICHAEL ROSENDALE AND TAMARA D. ROSENDALE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 7710-17L. Filed July 2, 2018. Glen E. Frost, Kaitlyn A. Loughner, and Robert B. Hamilton, for petitioners. Elizabeth C. Mourges and Nancy M. Gilmore, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION LAUBER, Judge: In this collection due process (CDP) case, petitioners seek review pursuant to section 6330(d)(1)1 of the determinations by the Internal 1 All statutory references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect at all relevant times, and all Rule…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  4. Florida Peach Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  5. Murphy v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API