Legal Opinion
Schiffman v. Cimarron Aircraft Corp.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 8, 1985No. CIV 83-1284-RPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
This is a summary judgment on a claim that a male employee was discriminated against on the basis of sex because his wife received no maternity benefits under an employment-related group disability insurance policy. After the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission granted Plaintiff a Right to Sue, this suit was filed in the Northern District of Oklahoma. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss was denied. On Defendant’s motion, venue was moved to this Court. Both parties filed Motions for Summary Judgment. While those motions were pending, the Supreme Court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Texas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- 40 Fair empl.prac.cas. 118, 39 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,941, 7 Employee Benefits Ca 1081 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Texas Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986