United States v. One Haynes Automobile
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, District Judge.
This action has been submitted upon the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts. It appears therefrom that the Anglo-California Trust Company is the owner of a certain Haynes automobile; that this machine was in the possession of one Richard Frank; that one Harry Indorsky hired Frank to drive him in the machine as a passenger through the streets of San Francisco; that Indorsky, without Frank’s knowledge or consent, had in his possession in the automobile certain narcotics upon which the tax had not been paid, and sold such narcotics to one Halstead; that Indorsky…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. One 1940 ChryslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. One 1937 Plymouth 6 4-Door SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Yellow Mfg. Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- United States v. One (1) Oldsmobile SedanDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.