Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Zurixx
District Court, D. Utah
Decided August 10, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00713Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and MEMORANDUM DECISION AND UTAH DIVISION OF CONSUMER ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PROTECTION, INTERVENE (DOC. NO. 242) Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:19-cv-00713-DK-DAO ZURIXX, LLC, et al., Judge Dale A. Kimball Defendants. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Before the court is the Proposed Intervenors’ Rule 24 Motion to Intervene, (“Mot.,” Doc. No. 242), filed by Students of Zurixx (“Students”). Students move to intervene to seek declaratory judgment and equitable relief against Plaintiffs Federal Trade…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- United Nuclear Corporation v. Cranford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.