Legal Opinion

Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation v. Washington

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided February 22, 1978No. 3868 and 3909PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONSOLIDATED DECISION

Before KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, and EAST and TURRENTINE, District Judges.* EAST, District Judge:

These causes, Nos. 3868 and 3909, were by stipulation of the parties consolidated for hearing and submitted to the Court on their respective merits following oral argument at Seattle, Washington on March 28, 1977.

CAUSE NO. 3868

PARTIES:

The plaintiffs are Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, Lummi Indian Tribe, and Makah Indian Tribe (Tribes).

*1345The defendants are the State of Washington; Charles Hodde, Director, Department of Revenue, State of Washington; Jack G.…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Department of Taxation and Finance of NY v. Milhelm Attea & Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Oneida Nation of New York v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, Cross v. State of New York, Counties of Broome, Chenango, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oswego, Oneida, Onondaga, St. Lawrence and Tioga, Individually and as Class Representatives, Cross-Appellants. Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin and Oneida of the Thames Band, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. State of New York, Counties of Broome, Chenango, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, St. Lawrence and Tioga, New York, and Valentine Ryan, New York Electric & Gas Corp., St. Regis Paper Co., and Georgia Pacific Corp., Individually and as Class Representatives, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. Baksalary v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API