Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Hartman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1916No. 5703PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEY,. C. J.

This is a divorce suit wherein judgment was rendered for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed. We have considered all the questions presented in appellant’s brief, and have reached the conclusion that the judgment should be affirmed. The criticisms urged against the ehargé of the court are not regarded as tenable ;' nor do we think the court erred in refusing to give appellant’s requested instructions. But if error was committed in any of the respects referred to, we are still of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. Appellant produced no other witness than herself…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Lohmuller v. LohmullerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Bostwick v. BostwickTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Haygood v. HaygoodTexas Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McNabb v. McNabbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Christoph v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Cohen v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Swartz v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Christoph v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API